Measures Development
Table 4. Data measures used in the SCA Tool suite.
No | RESTORE Goal | Priority Attributes | Name of the Measure |
1 | Habitat | Vulnerability to Conversion | Project Area (Acres) |
2 | Connectivity | Connectivity to Existing Protected Area (Index) | |
3 | Connectivity of Natural Lands (Percentage) | ||
4 | Vulnerability to Conversion | Threat of Urbanization (Index) | |
5 | Land Cover | Composition of Priority Natural Lands (Percentage) | |
6 | Water Quality & Quantity | Quality | 303(d): Impaired Watershed Area (Percentage) |
7 | Flow | Hydrologic Response to Land-Use Change (Percentage) | |
8 | Floodplain and Streambank Integrity | Lateral Connectivity of Floodplain (Percentage) | |
9 | Water Availability | Percent Irrigated Agriculture (Percentage) | |
10 | Floodplain and Streambank Integrity | Composition of Riparian Zone Lands (Index) | |
11 | Hydromodification | Presence of Impoundments (Binary) | |
12 | Living Coastal & Marine Resources | Biodiversity | Vulnerable Areas of Terrestrial Endemic Species (Index) |
13 | Critical Species | Threatened and Endangered Species - Critical Habitat Area (Percentage) | |
14 | Threatened and Endangered Species - Number of Species (Count) | ||
15 | Light Pollution | Light Pollution Index (Index) | |
16 | Community Resilience | Historic Places | National Register of Historic Places (Count) |
17 | National Heritage Area (Percentage) | ||
18 | Vulnerability | Proximity to Socially Vulnerability Communities (Index) | |
19 | Threat | Community Threat Index (Index) | |
20 | Gulf Economy | Land Cover | High Priority Working Lands (Percentage) |
21 | Fisheries | Commercial Fishing Reliance (Index) | |
22 | Recreational Fishing Engagement (Index) | ||
23 | Recreation | Access & Recreation - Number of Access Points (Count) |
The methods used to process each measure were dependent on the type of source data (i.e., vector or raster) and the type of measure unit (i.e., index, binary, percentage area, count, or length). See Table 5 for a more detailed summary of the source data type and measure unit type for each of the 22 measures. Figures 13 and 14 provide visualizations of a general workflow used to produce measures from vector and raster source data, respectively.
Table 5. Summary of source data type and measure unit type for each measure.
Source Data Type | Measure Type | Measure |
Vector to Measure | Index (0-1) | Commercial Fishing Reliance |
Recreational Fishing Engagement | ||
Binary (0/1) | Connectivity to Existing Protected Area | |
Proximity to Socially Vulnerable Communities | ||
Presence of Impoundments | ||
Percentage Area (%) | 303(d): Impaired Watershed Area | |
Hydrologic Response to Land-Use Change | ||
Composition of Riparian Zone Lands | ||
Threatened and Endangered Species - Critical Habitat Area | ||
National Heritage Area | ||
Count (#) | Threatened and Endangered Species - Number of Species | |
National Register of Historic Places | ||
Access & Recreation: Number of Access Points | ||
Raster to Measure | Index (0-1) | Threat of Urbanization |
Vulnerable Areas of Terrestrial Endemic Species | ||
Light Pollution Index | ||
Community Threat Index | ||
Percentage Area (%) | Lateral Connectivity of Floodplain | |
Connectivity of Natural Lands | ||
Composition of Priority Natural Lands | ||
High Priority Working Lands | ||
Percent Irrigated Agriculture |
Figures 15a-15e illustrate the five different types of data measures in preprocessed states (i.e., index, binary, percentage area, count, and length) that are present within the database. Figures 16a and 16b illustrate the two types of source data (i.e., vector and raster) that were utilized in processing the database measures.
There are two potential sources of uncertainty that need to be considered with the use of this database. First is the time lag between source data production and when the database was created, which will depend on each measure. As time progresses, the accuracy of each measure will inevitably decline, but the database used the most recent version of each source data to minimize any error induced by time lag. A second potential source of uncertainty comes from the 1 km2 resolution that was used for the hexagonal grid. Since the measures were defined to describe general features of an area for conservation considerations, and most lands conserved in this region are roughly 1 km2, the data resolution was adequate for assessments of land conservation value. Caution should thus be noted if using this database for purposes other than land conservation value.
The geodatabase is available at Scholar’s Junction, an institutional repository for Mississippi State University, as a shapefile. A readme file is available for download along with the database where the user can find instructions for how to convert the database from GeoJSON to other formats
For more information on individual SCA data measures see the “Support” section.
Last updated